1. flsa grievance: faq

 

2. correspondences from afge 2782's flsa grievance

grievance:

pursuant to article 8.8 of the contract between the parties, the union hereby files the following union grievance.

the union hereby grieves all conduct by the agency affecting all afge census (hq) bargaining unit(s) employees from september 1, 2006, through the date of the final decision on this grievance of agency actions (or inactions) as to bargaining unit employees that violate the fair labor standards act (flsa). the term bargaining unit employees include any agency employee who was a member of an afge bargaining unit at any time from september 1, 2006, through the present date (the backpay period). these agency violations include, as to bargaining unit employees, inter alia, improper exemption from the flsa; failure to credit hours worked; failure to credit hours worked and not documented (including suffer or permit hours); failure to pay overtime at an appropriate rate under the flsa; failure to properly pay flsa rates and/or hours for travel or leave.

the union demands, as a remedy, that the agency appropriately calculate and pay bargaining unit employees pay under the flsa. further, the union demands that the agency recalculate all wages paid bargaining unit employees that do not comply with the flsa and provide liquidated damages (or interest-whatever is higher) for having improperly paid bargaining unit employees during the backpay period. the union also demands that it be awarded all appropriate costs and attorney fees allowable under law.

the union hereby designates the following as its representative in this matter and directs the agency to deal directly with its designated representative.

afge gco

joe goldberg, esq.

 

 

agency response

september 4, 2009

dear mr. goldberg,

i am in receipt of the step (3) union grievance filed by frank silberstein, chief steward, afge local 2782, on september 1, 2009, regarding the following:

“the union hereby grieves all conduct by the agency affecting all afge census (hq) bargaining unit(s) employees from september 1, 2006, through the date of the final decision on this grievance of agency actions (or inactions) as to bargaining unit employees that violate the fair labor standards act (flsa). the term bargaining unit employees include any agency employee who was a member of an afge bargaining unit at any time from september 1, 2006, through the present date (the backpay period). these agency violations include, as to bargaining unit employees, inter alia, improper exemption from the flsa; failure to credit hours worked; failure to credit hours worked and not documented (including suffer or permit hours); failure to pay overtime at an appropriate rate under the flsa; failure to properly pay flsa rates and/or hours for travel or leave.

the union demands, as a remedy, that the agency appropriately calculate and pay bargaining unit employees pay under the flsa. further, the union demands that the agency recalculate all wages paid bargaining unit employees that do not comply with the flsa and provide liquidated damages (or interest-whatever is higher) for having improperly paid bargaining unit employees during the backpay period. the union also demands that it be awarded all appropriate costs and attorney fees allowable under law.”

chief steward silberstein advises that you have been designated as the representative for the afge local 2782 in this matter. according to article 8.8 of our labor agreement (copy enclosed), the chief, personnel division, will return an improperly filed grievance to the grievant/representative with a statement of its deficiencies. the grievant/representative will have 5 additional days from the receipt of the notice of deficiency to refile the grievance with the deficiencies corrected.

i am notifying you that i find this grievance to be improperly filed. our labor agreement specifies that written grievances must contain information regarding the specific action, omission, or condition causing the grievance and/or the provision of our labor agreement, law or regulation allegedly violated, misinterpreted or misapplied, if any. in the written grievance, chief steward silberstein has failed to provide specific information to serve as a basis for claiming that the agency has or is violating the flsa. therefore, i find this grievance to be deficient because it does not contain the necessary information required for filing a step (3) grievance under the terms of our labor agreement.

based on the aforementioned, i am returning this grievance to you as improperly filed.

if you have any questions concerning this matter, please direct them to ben felder, chief of labor management branch, at (301) 763-2651.

sincerely,

tyra dent smith

chief, human resources division

 

 

joe golberg's sept 9 response to the agency

september 9, 2009

dear ms. smith:

this letter is in response to your letter dated september 4, 2009 (hereinafter “letter”), wherein you responded to the grievance filed by afge l-2782, on september 1, 2009 (hereinafter the “grievance”). in your letter you have stated that the grievance was “improperly filed”. i disagree. the grievance, as quoted in your letter, clearly states the subject of the grievance, who is covered by the grievance, the law that the agency is alleged to have breached in its dealings with the afge bargaining unit employees, the liability period, and the remedy sought.

the flra has clearly held that alleged violation of the flsa by a federal government agency is remediable via the grievance process. u.s department of health and human services, social security administration, baltimore, maryland and american federation of government employees, 44 flra no. 66, 44 flra 773 (april 14, 1992). in the ssa and subsequent cases, the flra has clearly held that flsa claims are subject both to the negotiated grievance procedure under 5 u.s.c. § 7121 and such claims are clearly arbitrable.

while not necessary, i would further note that the contract between the parties, article 15.5 explicitly requires the employer/agency to pay overtime pursuant to “…applicable laws, rules, and regulartions.” the grievance clearly alleges that the agency’s practice inpayment of flsa violates the law and its accompanying rules and regulations.

i (as the attorney explicity designated by afge l-2782 as its representative in the grievance) therefore reject the agency’s contention that the grievance was “improperly filed” as alleged in your letter.

as a side-bar, i would noted that i hereby offer to work with the agencyh in insuring that the agency accurately identifies, computes, and timely pays afge l-2782 bargaining unit employees flsa overtime that has note been properly computed and/or paid by the agency during the claims period as specified in the grievance. i would note that the agency is liable for attorney fees in this matter pursuant to both 5 u.s.c. § 5596 and (more importantly), 29 u.s.c. § 216 (b)at my full “laffey matrix” hourly rate of $465.00 per hour. ms. dent, we can do this the easy wasy (via working constructively together) which will substantially reduce the agency’s exposure to attorney’s fees or we can fight. i am prepared to do either. if you care to research the matter you will find that i have been litigating flsa overtime pay cases for the afge general counsel’s office for over 25 years and have been directly involved in making much of the federal sector flsa case law. in the end the agency will end up properly paying its afge bargaining unit employees. the question you have to ask is whether it’s in the agency’s best interest to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in addition to the back pay. again, the choice if yours.

i would appreciate a timely reply to the subjects of this letter and certainly remain open to communications as to the subject matter of the grievance.

sincerely,

joe goldberg,

afge general counsel- litigation

 

pdf scanned copy of all correspondence (pdf)

 

 


last update: october 28, 2009
contact the webminder:

 

 

 

 

 

 

louis vuitton outlet